J. L. Vaughan Heating & Engineering Co. v. Cantor

Massachusetts Appeals Court

J. L. Vaughan Heating & Engineering Co. v. Cantor

323 N.E.2d 736, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 709, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 716

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedFebruary 24, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 323 N.E.2d 736 (J. L. Vaughan Heating & Engineering Co. v. Cantor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. L. Vaughan Heating & Engineering Co. v. Cantor, 323 N.E.2d 736, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 709, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 716 (Mass. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

The only exception in a needlessly reproduced transcript of 143 pages which is adverted to in the defend[710]*710ants’ brief of approximately five pages (including one page of statutory provisions) is overruled because the brief fails to contain anything bearing even a faint resemblance to argument of the exception. Rule 1:13 of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 889 (1972). Lolos v. Berlin, 338 Mass. 10, 13-14 (1958). The brief is struck from the files. Rule 1:15(1) (d) and (6) of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 890, 891 (1972). The plaintiff is to have double costs from July 1, 1974, together with interest from that date on the damages found by the trial judge (and on the interest ordered on those damages), to be computed at the rate of twelve percent per annum. G. L. c. 211A, § 15.

Michael M. Bronstein, for the defendants, submitted a brief. James M. McDonough for the plaintiff.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The only exception in a needlessly reproduced transcript of 143 pages which is adverted to in the defend[710]*710ants’ brief of approximately five pages (including one page of statutory provisions) is overruled because the brief fails to contain anything bearing even a faint resemblance to argument of the exception. Rule 1:13 of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 889 (1972). Lolos v. Berlin, 338 Mass. 10, 13-14 (1958). The brief is struck from the files. Rule 1:15(1) (d) and (6) of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 890, 891 (1972). The plaintiff is to have double costs from July 1, 1974, together with interest from that date on the damages found by the trial judge (and on the interest ordered on those damages), to be computed at the rate of twelve percent per annum. G. L. c. 211A, § 15.

Michael M. Bronstein, for the defendants, submitted a brief. James M. McDonough for the plaintiff.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 N.E.2d 736, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 709, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-l-vaughan-heating-engineering-co-v-cantor-massappct-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack