J. L. Hammett Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

J. L. Hammett Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 549, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 696

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 26, 1951

DocketNo. 7959; Entry No. 720396

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 549 (J. L. Hammett Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. L. Hammett Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 549, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 696 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Cline, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of 9,70o1 pounds of plasticine imported from England. When the case was [550]*550originally before the court, it was held that no foreign or export value existed and an order was issued restoring it to the calendar in order that evidence of United States value might be produced. J. L. Hammett Company v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 454, Reap. Dec. 7702. Thereafter, an application for review filed by the Government was dismissed by the court. United States v. J. L. Hammett Company, 23 Cust. Ct. 242, Reap. Dec. 7713. Subsequently, the case was transferred to Boston and when called for trial was formally abandoned. The appeal for reappraisement is therefore dismissed and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cline, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of 9,70o1 pounds of plasticine imported from England. When the case was [550]*550originally before the court, it was held that no foreign or export value existed and an order was issued restoring it to the calendar in order that evidence of United States value might be produced. J. L. Hammett Company v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 454, Reap. Dec. 7702. Thereafter, an application for review filed by the Government was dismissed by the court. United States v. J. L. Hammett Company, 23 Cust. Ct. 242, Reap. Dec. 7713. Subsequently, the case was transferred to Boston and when called for trial was formally abandoned. The appeal for reappraisement is therefore dismissed and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Cust. Ct. 549, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-l-hammett-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack