J. Kinderman & Sons v. United Nat.

619 A.2d 1058, 533 Pa. 87
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 17, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 619 A.2d 1058 (J. Kinderman & Sons v. United Nat.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. Kinderman & Sons v. United Nat., 619 A.2d 1058, 533 Pa. 87 (Pa. 1993).

Opinion

533 Pa. 87 (1993)
619 A.2d 1058

J. KINDERMAN & SONS, INC., t/a Brite Star Manufacturing Company, Appellant,
v.
UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Lawrence Okoniewski, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Christine Okoniewski, Deceased, and Lawrence A. Okoniewski, Jr., and Linda Okoniewski, as individuals in their own right, and Stanton Discount Pharmacy, Inc. and George Kellan, t/a Smyrna Discount and/or Smyrna Discount Drugs and Nathan Schecter and Sons and J. Orman, Inc., and World Traders and Kiu Hung Industrial Co., Ltd. and the Wirkman Company and Republic Hogg Robinson of Pennsylvania, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 25, 1993.
Decided February 17, 1993.

Roger F. Cox, Philadelphia, for J. Kinderman.

Frederick Lachat, Jr., Philadelphia, for United Nat. Ins. Co.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

FLAHERTY and ZAPPALA, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. Kinderman & Sons, Inc. v. United National Insurance
619 A.2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 A.2d 1058, 533 Pa. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-kinderman-sons-v-united-nat-pa-1993.