J. K. Orr Shoe Co. v. Kimbrough

25 S.E. 204, 99 Ga. 143
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1896·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. Although an equitable petition may mention the name of a corporation and contain a prayer for certain relief against it, such corporation is not a party to the petition when there is no prayer for process as to it.

2. Where an equitable petition did not pray for substantial relief against any party thereto who was a resident of the county in the superior court of which the petition was filed, and was not a petition for an injunction to stay pending proceedings of any kind in that county, that court was without jurisdiction -of the case, and the petition should have been dismissed on demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. K. Orr Shoe Co. v. Kimbrough, 25 S.E. 204, 99 Ga. 143 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 204 (J. K. Orr Shoe Co. v. Kimbrough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burch v. Crown Laundry
50 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Lassiter v. Bank of Dawson
11 S.E.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Irons v. American National Bank
172 S.E. 629 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Barnes-Fain Co. v. Chandler
96 S.E. 179 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Toland v. Camp
75 S.E. 138 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
White v. Brown
73 S.E. 853 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Clayton v. Farrar Lumber Co.
45 S.E. 723 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)