J. K. Cobb & Co. v. Hancock

1911 OK 398, 119 P. 627, 31 Okla. 42, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 11
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 14, 1911·No. 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

TURNER, C. J.

It failing to appear from the record or otherwise that defendant was present, either’ in person or by counsel, at the settlement of the case-made filed herein, or that notice of the time thereof was served or waived, the motion to dismiss this proceeding in error is sustained, and it is so ordered. First National Bank, etc., v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383, 108 Pac. 748.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. K. Cobb & Co. v. Hancock, 1911 OK 398, 119 P. 627, 31 Okla. 42, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 11 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 398 (J. K. Cobb & Co. v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harkins v. McPhail
1920 OK 14 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Brown v. Marks
1915 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Wyant v. Wheeler
1913 OK 270 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Pain v. Wylie
1913 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Jones v. Jones
1913 OK 103 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)