J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., the Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Health Care Centers D/B/A Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., the Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Health Care Centers D/B/A Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A.

DecidedJune 12, 2014

Docket01-14-00459-CV

StatusPublished

This text of J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., the Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Health Care Centers D/B/A Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A. (J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., the Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Health Care Centers D/B/A Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., the Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Health Care Centers D/B/A Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., The Methodist Hospital, The Methodist Health Care Centers d/b/a Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook,and Neptune Emerg Emergency Physician Services, P.A.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00459-CV

Trial court case number: 2003-53712

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

On June 12, 2014, J. James Redmond filed Appellant’s Expedited Motion for Emergency Stay. The motion is GRANTED. The trial court’s May 30, 2014 Order Granting Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement and Denying Receiver’s Motion for Release of Funds for Payment of Receivership Fees is STAYED, pending this Court’s review of Redmond’s Motion for Review of trial Court Order Denying Motion to Set Amount of Supersedeas Bond, also filed on June 12, 2014. Further, the clerk of the trial court is enjoined from disbursing the relevant funds from the registry until our review is complete. Appellees are ORDERED to provide a response to appellant’s Motion for Review of Trial Court Order Denying Motion to Set Amount of Supersedeas Bond within ten (10) days of the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 12, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., The Methodist Hospital, The Methodist Health Care Centers d/b/a Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook,and Neptune Emerg Emergency Physician Services, P.A.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00459-CV

Trial court case number: 2003-53712

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

On June 12, 2014, J. James Redmond filed Appellant’s Expedited Motion for Emergency Stay. The motion is GRANTED. The trial court’s May 30, 2014 Order Granting Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement and Denying Receiver’s Motion for Release of Funds for Payment of Receivership Fees is STAYED, pending this Court’s review of Redmond’s Motion for Review of trial Court Order Denying Motion to Set Amount of Supersedeas Bond, also filed on June 12, 2014. Further, the clerk of the trial court is enjoined from disbursing the relevant funds from the registry until our review is complete. Appellees are ORDERED to provide a response to appellant’s Motion for Review of Trial Court Order Denying Motion to Set Amount of Supersedeas Bond within ten (10) days of the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 12, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., the Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Health Care Centers D/B/A Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-james-raymond-v-joseph-degioanni-emtel-inc-and-brazos-emergency-texapp-2014.