J. J. v. City of San Diego

Ninth Circuit

J. J. v. City of San Diego

59 F.4th 1327

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 2023

Docket20-55622

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 59 F.4th 1327 (J. J. v. City of San Diego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. J. v. City of San Diego, 59 F.4th 1327 (9th Cir. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

J. K. J., individually, and successor in No. 20-55622 interest to the Deceased Aleah Jenkins, by by and through his guardian-ad-litem Jeremy D.C. No. Hillyer, 3:19-cv-02123-CAB-RBB Southern District of California, Plaintiff-Appellant, San Diego

v. ORDER

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; DAVID NISLET, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Police Chief of the San Diego Police Department; LAWRENCE DURBIN, an individual; JASON TAUB, an individual; DOES, 1-10, Inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

NICHOLAS CASICOLA,

Defendant.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI