J. J. v. City of San Diego

59 F.4th 1327
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 17, 2023·No. 20-55622·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

J. K. J., individually, and successor in No. 20-55622 interest to the Deceased Aleah Jenkins, by by and through his guardian-ad-litem Jeremy D.C. No. Hillyer, 3:19-cv-02123-CAB-RBB Southern District of California, Plaintiff-Appellant, San Diego

v. ORDER

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; DAVID NISLET, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Police Chief of the San Diego Police Department; LAWRENCE DURBIN, an individual; JASON TAUB, an individual; DOES, 1-10, Inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

NICHOLAS CASICOLA,

Defendant.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. J. v. City of San Diego, 59 F.4th 1327 (9th Cir. 2023).

59 F.4th 1327 (J. J. v. City of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related