J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex

Supreme Court

J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex

241 U.S. 639, 36 S. Ct. 285

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 24, 1916·No. 199·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 382; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U. S. 361; Davis v. Massa *640 chusetts, 167 U. S. 43; (3) Iowa Central Ry. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Roby v. South Park Commissioners, 238 U. S. 610.

Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 382; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U. S. 361; Davis v. Massa *640 chusetts, 167 U. S. 43; (3) Iowa Central Ry. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Roby v. South Park Commissioners, 238 U. S. 610.

Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex, 241 U.S. 639, 36 S. Ct. 285 (1916).

Pincite

241 U.S. 639 (J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related