J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Rogers

110 S.E. 926, 118 S.C. 497, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 233
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 19, 1921·No. 10793·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The exceptions are overruled, and judgment of Circuit Court affirmed, on the ground that the Circuit Judge was clearly right in finding for the respondent. Appellant is not an innocent purchaser for value without notice. The evidence clearly shows that appellant did have notice. There is no proof of payment of value; purchaser had due notice of respondent’s rights. There would be a palpable miscarriage of justice to reverse the judgment of Circuit Court. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Rogers, 110 S.E. 926, 118 S.C. 497, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 233 (S.C. 1921).

110 S.E. 926 (J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.