J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Rogers
This text of 110 S.E. 926 (J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The exceptions are overruled, and judgment of Circuit Court affirmed, on the ground that the Circuit Judge was clearly right in finding for the respondent. Appellant is not an innocent purchaser for value without notice. The evidence clearly shows that appellant did have notice. There is no proof of payment of value; purchaser had due notice of respondent’s rights. There would be a palpable miscarriage of justice to reverse the judgment of Circuit Court. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.E. 926, 118 S.C. 497, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-i-case-threshing-machine-co-v-rogers-sc-1921.