J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Faison

74 S.E. 1003, 11 Ga. App. 173, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 313
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 22, 1912
Docket4021
StatusPublished

This text of 74 S.E. 1003 (J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Faison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Faison, 74 S.E. 1003, 11 Ga. App. 173, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 313 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

This was a suit in a justice’s court, to recover for services under an alleged verbal contract. The services were rendered, but the evidence was in conflict as to the execution of a binding contract of employment. The justice rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and, on appeal, a jury in the superior court rendered a like verdict, which, on motion for a new trial, was approved by the trial judge. No error of law is complained of, and the verdict settles the conflict in the evidence. Judgment affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 1003, 11 Ga. App. 173, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-i-case-threshing-machine-co-v-faison-gactapp-1912.