J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Ditto

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Ditto

1912 OK 42, 120 P. 636, 31 Okla. 149, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 15

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 9, 1912

Docket1288

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 42 (J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Ditto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Ditto, 1912 OK 42, 120 P. 636, 31 Okla. 149, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 15 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on November 9, 1910. The cause was duly assigned for hearing at the November, 1911, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court. (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi.)

It follows that the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAMS, J.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on November 9, 1910. The cause was duly assigned for hearing at the November, 1911, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court. (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi.)

It follows that the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 42, 120 P. 636, 31 Okla. 149, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-i-case-threshing-mach-co-v-ditto-okla-1912.