J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

Ninth Circuit

J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

400 F.2d 392

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 1968

Docket21814_1

StatusPublished

This text of 400 F.2d 392 (J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness, 400 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. 1 We also reaffirm this Court’s prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant. 2

Affirmed.

1

. See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210.

2

. See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L.Ed.2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S.Ct. 1315, 18 D.Ed.2d 343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI