J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

Ninth Circuit

J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

400 F.2d 392

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 23, 1968·No. 21814_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. 1 We also reaffirm this Court’s prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant. 2

Affirmed.

1

. See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210.

2

. See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L.Ed.2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S.Ct. 1315, 18 D.Ed.2d 343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. 1 We also reaffirm this Court’s prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant. 2

Affirmed.

1

. See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210.

2

. See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L.Ed.2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S.Ct. 1315, 18 D.Ed.2d 343.

J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness, 400 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

400 F.2d 392 (J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related