J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. Arnold
397 F.2d 810
Opinion
We have examined appellant’s assignments of error and find no merit in them. Twice before, this court has affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s petitions to review the Order of the Referee in Bankruptcy. See Arnold v. Arnold, 9 Cir., 1964, 326 F.2d 960, and Arnold v. Arnold, 9 Cir., 1966, 356 F.2d 873.
We affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. Arnold, 397 F.2d 810 (9th Cir. 1968).
397 F.2d 810 (J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. Arnold
326 F.2d 960 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
J. Howard Arnold, Debtor in Possession v. Frances K. Arnold
356 F.2d 873 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)