J. Herbert Bate Co. v. Bryant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

J. Herbert Bate Co. v. Bryant

129 S.E. 814, 190 N.C. 868, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 220

DecidedOctober 28, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 814 (J. Herbert Bate Co. v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Herbert Bate Co. v. Bryant, 129 S.E. 814, 190 N.C. 868, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 220 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The remainder judgment for the difference between plaintiff’s claim and defendant’s counterclaim, is sanctioned by what is said in Sewing Machine Co. v. Burger, 181 N. C., 241.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. The evidence was plenary and conflicting on both issues. There is no reversible error appearing on the record. The exceptions relating to the exclusion of evidence must be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The remainder judgment for the difference between plaintiff’s claim and defendant’s counterclaim, is sanctioned by what is said in Sewing Machine Co. v. Burger, 181 N. C., 241.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. The evidence was plenary and conflicting on both issues. There is no reversible error appearing on the record. The exceptions relating to the exclusion of evidence must be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.E. 814, 190 N.C. 868, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-herbert-bate-co-v-bryant-nc-1925.