J. H. & S. Theatres, Inc. v. Fay

235 A.D. 820
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1932
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 820 (J. H. & S. Theatres, Inc. v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. H. & S. Theatres, Inc. v. Fay, 235 A.D. 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings and judgment denied, with ten dollars costs, and the motion for reargument dismissed. There was no authority in the court below to amend the findings or judgment after they had been signed and entered. (Chester v. Buffalo Car Mfg. Co., ' íS N. Y. 425, 439; Herpe v. Herpe, 225 id. 323; Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone- Cataract P. Co., 194 App. Div. 819.) If either of the parties was aggrieved by the judgment the remedy was by appeal. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone-Cataract Paper Co.
194 A.D. 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-h-s-theatres-inc-v-fay-nyappdiv-1932.