J. H. Robinson Truck Lines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 657

Court of Appeals of Texas

J. H. Robinson Truck Lines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 657

251 S.W.2d 572, 1952 Tex. LEXIS 455

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 8, 1952

DocketNo. 12497

StatusPublished

This text of 251 S.W.2d 572 (J. H. Robinson Truck Lines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 657) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. H. Robinson Truck Lines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 657, 251 S.W.2d 572, 1952 Tex. LEXIS 455 (Tex. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

POPE, Justice.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this case because the appeal is neither from a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order.

The trial court sustained several special exceptions to the allegations of appellant’s petition for a temporary injunction. Leave to amend was neither sought nor denied, and the order of the court in no way dismissed the suit. Appellant’s prayer for relief has been neither granted nor denied, and the trial court has made no adjudication on either the interlocutory or the final phases of the suit. The case is still pending on the docket of the trial court, and there is no appealable order before us.

Since this ’Court does not have jurisdiction, the appellees’ motion to dismiss is granted. Dixon v. Sanderson, Tex.Sup., 6 S.W. 831; Hicks v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 181 S.W.2d 982; Wedgworth v. Davenport, Tex.Civ.App., 170 S.W.2d 789; Secrest v. Ledbetter, Tex.Civ.App., 106 S.W.2d 740.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POPE, Justice.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this case because the appeal is neither from a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order.

The trial court sustained several special exceptions to the allegations of appellant’s petition for a temporary injunction. Leave to amend was neither sought nor denied, and the order of the court in no way dismissed the suit. Appellant’s prayer for relief has been neither granted nor denied, and the trial court has made no adjudication on either the interlocutory or the final phases of the suit. The case is still pending on the docket of the trial court, and there is no appealable order before us.

Since this ’Court does not have jurisdiction, the appellees’ motion to dismiss is granted. Dixon v. Sanderson, Tex.Sup., 6 S.W. 831; Hicks v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 181 S.W.2d 982; Wedgworth v. Davenport, Tex.Civ.App., 170 S.W.2d 789; Secrest v. Ledbetter, Tex.Civ.App., 106 S.W.2d 740.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 S.W.2d 572, 1952 Tex. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-h-robinson-truck-lines-inc-v-international-brotherhood-of-teamsters-texapp-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack