J. H. Olden Realty Co. v. Intco Corp.

Supreme Court of Georgia

J. H. Olden Realty Co. v. Intco Corp.

353 S.E.2d 814, 256 Ga. 635, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 569

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 28, 1987·No. 43894·Published

Opinion

Weltner, Justice.

The complex factual setting of this case need not be set out here, as this holding addresses but one of several potential issues. Under Intco’s theory, the entire 60-day contractual period might expire without Olden’s having notice or knowledge of its rights. This cannot be, and the motion for grant of summary judgment properly should have been denied.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weltner, Justice.

The complex factual setting of this case need not be set out here, as this holding addresses but one of several potential issues. Under Intco’s theory, the entire 60-day contractual period might expire without Olden’s having notice or knowledge of its rights. This cannot be, and the motion for grant of summary judgment properly should have been denied.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, J., who dissents.

J. H. Olden Realty Co. v. Intco Corp., 353 S.E.2d 814, 256 Ga. 635, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 569 (Ga. 1987).

Pincite

353 S.E.2d 814 (J. H. Olden Realty Co. v. Intco Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.