J. H. Marsman v. Commissioner

9 T.C.M. 108, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 270
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1950
DocketDocket Nos. 18590, 18591.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 9 T.C.M. 108 (J. H. Marsman v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. H. Marsman v. Commissioner, 9 T.C.M. 108, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 270 (tax 1950).

Opinion

J. H. Marsman v. Commissioner. Mary A. Marsman v. Commissioner.
J. H. Marsman v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 18590, 18591.
United States Tax Court
1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 270; 9 T.C.M. (CCH) 108; T.C.M. (RIA) 50038;
February 21, 1950

*270 J. H. and Mary A. Marsman are husband and wife and citizens of the Commonwealth of the Philippines. J. H. Marsman visited the United States in connection with his business activities at various times in the taxable period of April 28, 1939 to December 31, 1941. After several previous visits in 1939 and 1940 in connection with her daughter's schooling, May A. Marsman arrived in the United States on September 22, 1940, with the intent to remain until such time as the danger of war in the Orient subsided. The respondent contends that the petitioners became alien residents of the United States when they first visited the United States on April 28, 1939.

On joint motion of the parties an order was granted severing for preliminary determination the question of residence vel non.

Held: 1. That J. H. Marsman was not a resident alien during any part of the taxable years.

2. That Mary A. Marsman was a resident alien during the period September 22, 1940 through December 31, 1941.

Herbert W. Clark, Leon De Fremery, C. E. Musto, Crocker Bldg., San Francisco, Calif., and Boice Gross, Esqs., for the petitioners. W. J. McFarland, Esq., for the respondent.

VAN FOSSAN

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

The respondent determined deficiencies in the petitioners' income tax liabilities and imposed penalties as follows:

25% DelinquencyTax
Docket No.PetitionerYearsPenaltyDeficiency
18590J. H. Marsman1939$32,727.86$130,911.42
194011,118.7344,474.93
194110,547.3842,189.53
18591Mary A. Marsman193970,452.93281,811.72
1940142,298.90
1941152,224.16

On joint motion of the parties, an order was granted by this Court severing for preliminary determination the question of residence vel non.

The sole issue, therefore, is whether or not the petitioners were resident aliens of the United States during any part of the taxable years.

The case was submitted upon a stipulation*272 of facts, exhibits, oral testimony and depositions.

Findings of Fact

The facts stipulated are so found. Other facts are found from the evidence.

J. H. Marsman was born in Holland in 1892. He became a sugar technologist. In 1918 he arrived in the Philippine Islands and in that year he became vice president and general manager of the Malabon Company, a sugar company. He remained in that position until 1925 when he left the Malabon Company to devote his full time to the development of mines and other business interests in the Philippine Islands and the Orient.

J. H. Marsman and Mary A. Marsman were married in the Philippine Islands on September 8, 1920. Prior to her marriage to Marsman in 1920, Mary A. Marsman was a resident of the Philippines and from her deceased husband had inherited mining interests, mining claims and other property located in the Philippine Islands.

J. H. Marsman and Mary A. Marsman became naturalized citizens of the Philippines in 1934 and remained citizens thereof until the inauguration of the "Commonwealth of the Philippines" on November 15, 1935, whereupon they became citizens of that Commonwealth. They remained citizens of the said Commonwealth until*273 at least a time subsequent to January 1, 1942.

In 1929 J. H. Marsman formed Marsman & Co., Inc., in and under the laws of the Philippines. This corporation then became, and since has remained, the principal operating company for Marsman interests and business activities in the Philippine Islands and the Orient.

The activities developed and managed by and through Marsman & Co., Inc., included five mines in the Philippines, a mine drainage company, a smelting company, a saw mill, a general insurance business, an importing and merchandising business and the Insular Drug Company. All of those business activities were in operation during the years 1939, 1940 and through 1941.

In addition, J. H. Marsman sent engineers to Burma in 1938 and the years following, and to China and the Dutch East Indies in 1936 and following, to explore mining possibilities in those countries.

Marsman Hong Kong China, Ltd., was formed to conduct mining operations, construction and other activities in China. This company operated continuously from 1937 through 1941.

In 1937 Marsman formed a company to conduct gold and silver mining operations in the Dutch East Indies. In 1935 Marsman Investments, Ltd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nubar v. Commissioner
13 T.C. 566 (U.S. Tax Court, 1949)
Patino v. Commissioner
13 T.C. 816 (U.S. Tax Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 T.C.M. 108, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-h-marsman-v-commissioner-tax-1950.