J. H. Linch & Co. v. City of Ozark

Alabama Court of Appeals

J. H. Linch & Co. v. City of Ozark

111 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 675

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 18, 1927

Docket4 Div. 304.

StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 925 (J. H. Linch & Co. v. City of Ozark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. H. Linch & Co. v. City of Ozark, 111 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

*676 BRICKEN, P. J.

This cause was tried and determined in the Houston county circuit court on July 12, 1926, and resulted' in a judgment for the plaintiff. From the judgment rendered accordingly, the defendants appealed to this court. The appeal here is rested upon the record only; there being no bill of exceptions. The cause is submitted upon motion of appellee to affirm for want of assignment of error. The required notice to appellants has been duly served. The motion of appellee is granted. Let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*676 BRICKEN, P. J.

This cause was tried and determined in the Houston county circuit court on July 12, 1926, and resulted' in a judgment for the plaintiff. From the judgment rendered accordingly, the defendants appealed to this court. The appeal here is rested upon the record only; there being no bill of exceptions. The cause is submitted upon motion of appellee to affirm for want of assignment of error. The required notice to appellants has been duly served. The motion of appellee is granted. Let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-h-linch-co-v-city-of-ozark-alactapp-1927.