J. H. Kartack Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

J. H. Kartack Co. v. United States

4 Cust. Ct. 845, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4115

United States Customs Court·Decided May 13, 1940·No. No. 4910; Entry Nos. A 241, A 254, A 255·Published

Opinion

Brown, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been stipulated and submitted for decision by counsel for the parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoiced unit prices. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been stipulated and submitted for decision by counsel for the parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoiced unit prices. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

J. H. Kartack Co. v. United States, 4 Cust. Ct. 845, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4115 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 845 (J. H. Kartack Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.