J. H. Bleistein, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

J. H. Bleistein, Inc. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 392, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 220

United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1953·No. No. 57190; protests 485549-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates (except bale 1115 on W. H. 14571, protest 909389-G) are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph . 1681 w,as sustained. .In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Ford, J., concurred. 'Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates (except bale 1115 on W. H. 14571, protest 909389-G) are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph . 1681 w,as sustained. .In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Ford, J., concurred. 'Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

J. H. Bleistein, Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 392, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 220 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 392 (J. H. Bleistein, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related