J G Glass Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins., No. Cv95 32 61 04 S (Sep. 6, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

J G Glass Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins., No. Cv95 32 61 04 S (Sep. 6, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5316-VVVV

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedSeptember 6, 1996

DocketNo. CV95 32 61 04 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5316-VVVV (J G Glass Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins., No. Cv95 32 61 04 S (Sep. 6, 1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J G Glass Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins., No. Cv95 32 61 04 S (Sep. 6, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5316-VVVV (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (#112)MOTION TO TRANSFER (#114) The Motion for Reconsideration, which was filed by defendant Hartford Fire Insurance Company, is denied. Section 351 of the General Statutes provides that "[n]o cause shall fail on the ground that it has been made returnable to an improper location." See Sprague v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities,3 Conn. App. 484, 489 A.2d 1064, cert. denied, 196 Conn. 804,492 A.2d 1240 (1985); see also Szabo v. Beregszazy, 9 Conn. App. 368,519 A.2d 81 (1986); Greeman's Trucking, Inc. v. Department ofRevenue Services, 6 Conn. App. 261, 263, f.n. 3, 504 A.2d 568 (1986).

The Motion to Transfer, which was filed by plaintiff J G Glass Company, is granted. CT Page 5316-WWWW

THIM, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (#112)MOTION TO TRANSFER (#114) The Motion for Reconsideration, which was filed by defendant Hartford Fire Insurance Company, is denied. Section 351 of the General Statutes provides that "[n]o cause shall fail on the ground that it has been made returnable to an improper location." See Sprague v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities,3 Conn. App. 484, 489 A.2d 1064, cert. denied, 196 Conn. 804,492 A.2d 1240 (1985); see also Szabo v. Beregszazy, 9 Conn. App. 368,519 A.2d 81 (1986); Greeman's Trucking, Inc. v. Department ofRevenue Services, 6 Conn. App. 261, 263, f.n. 3, 504 A.2d 568 (1986).

The Motion to Transfer, which was filed by plaintiff J G Glass Company, is granted. CT Page 5316-WWWW

THIM, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5316-VVVV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-g-glass-co-v-hartford-fire-ins-no-cv95-32-61-04-s-sep-6-1996-connsuperct-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack