J. Eisenberg, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

J. Eisenberg, Inc. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 422

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 13, 1961

DocketNo. 65454; protests 59/30347, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 422 (J. Eisenberg, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Eisenberg, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 422 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of thread waste; that the threads covered by the invoice descriptions in which the word “nylon” was used were of the same material as the threads in the knit cloth the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727); and that the threads covered by the invoice description in which the word “orlon” was used were made of noncellulosic materials, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of thread waste; that the threads covered by the invoice descriptions in which the word “nylon” was used were of the same material as the threads in the knit cloth the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727); and that the threads covered by the invoice description in which the word “orlon” was used were made of noncellulosic materials, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-eisenberg-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack