Home/U.S. Customs Court/J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 31, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2301
United States Customs Court·Decided July 18, 1967·No. C.D. 3060·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

OliveR, Judge:

This protest covers certain electrical components classified as parts of projectors under item 722.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff originally made its claim under item 722.42 at the rate of 11.5 per centum ad valorem. This was, however, abandoned and superseded by the following amended claims:

pMYuumrbogo3udXUxUZ/rlHKifYmiZQCY3a26keUg0D6u4dK5haRbY0rxr9JHDyC9gdojvEhIsNKyGpVHLbOhONOsWBdXB2HZLlbKA2SbVtCVPn6X51DDQC3G362MlwBWQTgBXpTlGGP+authGbmg/uP7LCcMiLxbob/EM0EUXJgahKUDsAbxb94WFW5nak9vG9wC7x54GIdj7V5kaaFl/f577PdCbNjF6Q7zIRjh9bAFCm/VIvhbhH4UXfVl7Je/oz4/CEl0bFhS6en+wA2yafmNrBmsyAaBERgbUW2F54i6CreYFAGqylha6dHYtoG5V5SvvT7tXmEjuHmu8ku/dPLGvSp68qun5Z0DldmHQ4AlE2cRaBo0jOyYqFv52gJYkpbSsOJLrADmVdMbvf535xRsL7Gx+FDsfClbWpaapuIilgvrJoYqmbMBOgbOi4OwHMMhOg4RdkzK0zM5bnd7lvuw3CcJFxHb/IKTuM7ObR6bfGXrDPDKhv7WzHho03ufoIMBeMoGF6VMAwh3GkvaFYGCx3zjyfgSsdjWRptlr92zYyARQcC2w39UbWcP7Mdw4eZ57RRJyewq06qOq4GywDRYUKkhjCfcwVg2AOb03+jcRZ1heaz3dsjI3r7FzVcxVddZA8HRgWh0AsclUDtyoYxyiJsDhctsQNyCTXo9HnfBVSgptJG0yrpZllbUIyR0NNRoRPYkvM+ltApYYK6S3E/ZzogZSJJ2s8f4qaldHazHTMzKBiGnwf

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 31, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2301 (cusc 1967).

59 Cust. Ct. 31 (J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E. R. Hawthorne & Co. v. United States
6 Ct. Int'l Trade 16 (Court of International Trade, 1983)
Tridon, Inc. v. United States
5 Ct. Int'l Trade 167 (Court of International Trade, 1983)
American Powerail, Inc. v. United States
83 Cust. Ct. 128 (U.S. Customs Court, 1979)
Porter v. United States
82 Cust. Ct. 259 (U.S. Customs Court, 1979)
Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United States
81 Cust. Ct. 46 (U.S. Customs Court, 1978)
Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States
79 Cust. Ct. 6 (U.S. Customs Court, 1977)
Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States
77 Cust. Ct. 9 (U.S. Customs Court, 1976)
Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United States
74 Cust. Ct. 134 (U.S. Customs Court, 1975)
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
65 Cust. Ct. 498 (U.S. Customs Court, 1970)
American Express Co. v. United States
65 Cust. Ct. 343 (U.S. Customs Court, 1970)
Liebert v. United States
65 Cust. Ct. 202 (U.S. Customs Court, 1970)
American Laubscher Corp. v. United States
64 Cust. Ct. 384 (U.S. Customs Court, 1970)
Fedtro, Inc. v. United States
64 Cust. Ct. 323 (U.S. Customs Court, 1970)
Great Western Sugar Co. v. United States
64 Cust. Ct. 127 (U.S. Customs Court, 1970)
Thornley v. United States
63 Cust. Ct. 536 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
Ideal Toy Corp. v. United States
63 Cust. Ct. 406 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
Robert Bosch Corp. v. United States
63 Cust. Ct. 158 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 734 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 536 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
West Coast Glass Distributors v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 444 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)