J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 265
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 462
United States Customs Court·Decided January 20, 1959·No. No. 62691; protest 284833-K/7161 (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of automobile tires similar in all material respects to those the subject of A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 327, C.D. 1882), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 265 (cusc 1959).

42 Cust. Ct. 265 (J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 327 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)