J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

436 F.2d 506
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided February 4, 1971·No. Customs Appeal No. 5372·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LANE, Judge.

The importer appeals from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, which overruled its protest and sustained the classification of certain “meter irises” under item 722.32 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as other parts for motion picture cameras. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust.Ct. 536, C.D. 3822 (1969). The court below in a thorough opinion by Judge Maletz reviewed the legislative intent relative to the provisions here involved and we find it unnecessary to repeat since we conclude that the decision and judgment below are correct.

On consideration of the transcript of record, the briefs, the arguments on appeal, and our recent decisions in American Express Company v. United States, 426 F.2d 383, 57 CCPA 100, C.A.D. 985 (decided May 28, 1970) and Costa International Corp. v. United States, 434 F.2d 1053, 58 CCPA, C.A.D. 1003 (decided December 10, 1970), we find no error in the decision of the United States Customs Court, reported supra.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States, 436 F.2d 506 (ccpa 1971).

436 F.2d 506 (J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United States
81 Cust. Ct. 46 (U.S. Customs Court, 1978)