J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

436 F.2d 506
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedFebruary 4, 1971
DocketCustoms Appeal No. 5372
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 436 F.2d 506 (J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States, 436 F.2d 506 (ccpa 1971).

Opinion

LANE, Judge.

The importer appeals from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, which overruled its protest and sustained the classification of certain “meter irises” under item 722.32 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as other parts for motion picture cameras. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust.Ct. 536, C.D. 3822 (1969). The court below in a thorough opinion by Judge Maletz reviewed the legislative intent relative to the provisions here involved and we find it unnecessary to repeat since we conclude that the decision and judgment below are correct.

On consideration of the transcript of record, the briefs, the arguments on appeal, and our recent decisions in American Express Company v. United States, 426 F.2d 383, 57 CCPA 100, C.A.D. 985 (decided May 28, 1970) and Costa International Corp. v. United States, 434 F.2d 1053, 58 CCPA, C.A.D. 1003 (decided December 10, 1970), we find no error in the decision of the United States Customs Court, reported supra.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United States
81 Cust. Ct. 46 (U.S. Customs Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-e-bernard-co-v-united-states-ccpa-1971.