J. D. Spencer Co. v. New York Review, Inc.

282 A.D. 659, 122 N.Y.S.2d 161
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 18, 1952, in New York County, which denied a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Memorandum bt the Court. The order appealed should be affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents, on the ground there are issues of fact to be tried including the basic issue as to whether the documents in question were procured by fraudulent representations. This should be pleaded as a separate defense. If such defense is sustained, the indorsement on the note and the guarantee were procured by fraud and they have no validity. To determine these and other issues, a trial is essential.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. D. Spencer Co. v. New York Review, Inc., 282 A.D. 659, 122 N.Y.S.2d 161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 659 (J. D. Spencer Co. v. New York Review, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramapo Bank v. Bechtel
539 A.2d 1276 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Exchange Leasing Corp. v. Bundy
29 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Walcutt v. Clevite Corp.
191 N.E.2d 894 (New York Court of Appeals, 1963)