J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 305, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1032
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Cust. Ct. 327
United States Customs Court·Decided December 23, 1952·No. No. 57001; petition 6857-R (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The vice president of the petitioner testified that he made entry of the merchandise at the value suggested by the appraiser. Subsequently, the appraiser advised that the entered value should be increased, and the petitioner filed an amended entry setting forth the suggested higher value. Through oversight, however, petitioner failed to deposit the estimated duties based on the amended entered value. When the inadvertence was discovered, petitioner attempted to pay the required amount of duty, but it was too late as the merchandise had been appraised. On the record presented the court was satisfied that the relief sought should be allowed. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 305, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1032 (cusc 1952).

30 Cust. Ct. 305 (J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.