J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. McCoy

168 S.E.2d 659, 119 Ga. App. 792, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1249

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1969·No. 44312·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hall, Judge.

After a change of condition hearing held upon request of the employer, the Board of Workmen’s Compensation found that the claimant’s condition of total disability had not changed, and directed the employer to resume compensation payments. The employer appeals from a judgment affirming the board’s award. There was contradictory medical evidence on the issue whether the claimant continued to be disabled because of her fall at work, upon which the original award was based. The evidence was sufficient to support the board’s award.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur. Robinson, Thompson, Buice ■.& Harben, Sam S. Harben, Jr., for appellant. Saul Blau, Ralph H. Hicks, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Judge.

After a change of condition hearing held upon request of the employer, the Board of Workmen’s Compensation found that the claimant’s condition of total disability had not changed, and directed the employer to resume compensation payments. The employer appeals from a judgment affirming the board’s award. There was contradictory medical evidence on the issue whether the claimant continued to be disabled because of her fall at work, upon which the original award was based. The evidence was sufficient to support the board’s award.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur. Robinson, Thompson, Buice ■.& Harben, Sam S. Harben, Jr., for appellant. Saul Blau, Ralph H. Hicks, for appellee.

J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. McCoy, 168 S.E.2d 659, 119 Ga. App. 792, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1249 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

168 S.E.2d 659 (J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related