J & D Einbinder Associates, Inc. v. ICC Performance 3 Ltd. Partnership

692 N.E.2d 125, 91 N.Y.2d 912, 669 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 182
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 692 N.E.2d 125 (J & D Einbinder Associates, Inc. v. ICC Performance 3 Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J & D Einbinder Associates, Inc. v. ICC Performance 3 Ltd. Partnership, 692 N.E.2d 125, 91 N.Y.2d 912, 669 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 182 (N.Y. 1998).

Opinion

Motion and cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order of affirmance sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution inasmuch as that order merely enforces a prior determination in the action (see, Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 18 [a] [3d ed]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 N.E.2d 125, 91 N.Y.2d 912, 669 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-d-einbinder-associates-inc-v-icc-performance-3-ltd-partnership-ny-1998.