J. D. Cathey, Inc. v. Henriques

3 La. App. 323, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 325
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 4, 1926·No. No. 10,349·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION

WESTERFIELD, J.

Relator herein seeks by writs of mandamus and prohibition to compel the Honorable W. Alexander Bahns, of the First City Court, to grant an order permitting him to file a supplemental and amended petition changing the form [324] of an action brought by relator in the said First City Court from one via executiva to one via ordinaria.

The relief sought is not in aid of our appellate jurisdiction and we have no supervisory jurisdiction over inferior tribunals. State ex rel. Louis A. Majendie vs. Constable of First City Court, et al., 1 La. App. p. 139.

The alternate writs of mandamus and prohibition heretofore issued are recalled and relator’s petition dismissed at his cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. D. Cathey, Inc. v. Henriques, 3 La. App. 323, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 325 (La. Ct. App. 1926).

3 La. App. 323 (J. D. Cathey, Inc. v. Henriques) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pfeiffer v. Hemisphere International Corp.
115 So. 2d 882 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
Bailey v. Spiro
169 So. 898 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)