J. C. Penny Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

J. C. Penny Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 553

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 29, 1960

DocketReap. Dec. 9887; Entry No. 44008

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 553 (J. C. Penny Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. C. Penny Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 553 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement for .decision upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise marked “A” and checked HN by Examiner Hidetaki Nakaki. on the invoices, and that such value in each instance is the unit appraised value, net, packed, less the amounts shown on the invoices for inland freight and other inland charges.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement for .decision upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise marked “A” and checked HN by Examiner Hidetaki Nakaki. on the invoices, and that such value in each instance is the unit appraised value, net, packed, less the amounts shown on the invoices for inland freight and other inland charges.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-c-penny-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.