J. C. Penny Co. v. Dahlan

356 So. 2d 64, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15525
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1978
DocketNo. 77-1176
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 So. 2d 64 (J. C. Penny Co. v. Dahlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. C. Penny Co. v. Dahlan, 356 So. 2d 64, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding the appellee, Mary Dahlan, the sum of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars and her husband, Arthur Dahlan, Fifteen Thousand Dollars for damages caused by injuries sustained by appellees as a result of Mary Dahlan’s slip and fall in appellant/Penney’s store.

In our review of the issues presented for decision, we have concluded that the issue of negligence was properly left to the jury on conflicting evidence and that the trial court was correct in denying the appellants’ motion for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting, there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

It is not this court’s province to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of facts. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siegel v. Cross Senior Care, Inc.
239 So. 3d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 So. 2d 64, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-c-penny-co-v-dahlan-fladistctapp-1978.