J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. Connor

24 A.D.2d 940, 265 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 940 (J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. Connor, 24 A.D.2d 940, 265 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders entered on May 4, 1965 providing for examination of defendant before trial under certain conditions and circumstances modified on the law and the facts and' in the exercise of discretion to deny protective order and to direct defendant to appear for examination on a day to be selected by him within six months of the entry of the order, and as so modified affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant is an American currently residing in Japan. He has business and other interests here and has hitherto made trips to this city at regular intervals of approximately six months. His affidavit seeking a protective order merely states that he has no present plans to come to the United .States. It does not state that he intends to discontinue the practice he has adopted. It does not appear that a direction for him to appear within a period that included his customary visits will put any undue burden on him. Settle order on notice. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders entered on May 4, 1965 providing for examination of defendant before trial under certain conditions and circumstances modified on the law and the facts and' in the exercise of discretion to deny protective order and to direct defendant to appear for examination on a day to be selected by him within six months of the entry of the order, and as so modified affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant is an American currently residing in Japan. He has business and other interests here and has hitherto made trips to this city at regular intervals of approximately six months. His affidavit seeking a protective order merely states that he has no present plans to come to the United .States. It does not state that he intends to discontinue the practice he has adopted. It does not appear that a direction for him to appear within a period that included his customary visits will put any undue burden on him. Settle order on notice. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 940, 265 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-c-penney-purchasing-corp-v-connor-nyappdiv-1965.