J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States

Fifth Circuit

J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States

320 F.2d 911

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 10, 1963·No. 20309_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully read the opinion of the District Court, 208 F.Supp. 594 (Southern District of Texas). This opinion, written by Judge Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., of this Court, sitting as a District Judge, carefully poses the issues and treats fully and carefully with the legal principles involved. Concluding, as we do, that the result arrived at by the District Court is correct and that the reasons assigned for reaching its conclusion persuade us of its correctness, we affirm the judgment on the opinion of the trial court. Any further or more elaborate exposition of our views would be unnecessary.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully read the opinion of the District Court, 208 F.Supp. 594 (Southern District of Texas). This opinion, written by Judge Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., of this Court, sitting as a District Judge, carefully poses the issues and treats fully and carefully with the legal principles involved. Concluding, as we do, that the result arrived at by the District Court is correct and that the reasons assigned for reaching its conclusion persuade us of its correctness, we affirm the judgment on the opinion of the trial court. Any further or more elaborate exposition of our views would be unnecessary.

The judgment is affirmed.

J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States, 320 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

320 F.2d 911 (J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related