J. C. De Jong & Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 834, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J. C. De Jong & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Cust. Ct. 605
United States Customs Court·Decided December 7, 1966·No. No. P66/361·Published

Opinion

Eao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. C. De Jong & Co., Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of brass pole rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. C. De Jong & Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 834, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1256 (cusc 1966).

57 Cust. Ct. 834 (J. C. De Jong & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kroder Reubel Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 274 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)