Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/J. C. Collier Co. v. Murphey

J. C. Collier Co. v. Murphey

33 S.E. 641, 108 Ga. 777, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 394
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 31, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 33 S.E. 641 (J. C. Collier Co. v. Murphey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. C. Collier Co. v. Murphey, 33 S.E. 641, 108 Ga. 777, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 394 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Fish, J.

Where the. only error alleged in a petition for certiorari was the refusal of the judge trying the case to allow counsel for plaintiff in certiorari to open and conclude the argument, and where there was nothing in the record before the superior court showing that the petitioner' had been in fact injured, even if such ruling of the trial judge were erroneous, it was error to sustain the certiorari and remand the case for a new trial. In order to reverse a judgment, two things — error and injury — must affirmatively appear. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. Cornett
213 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Harrison v. Regents of the University System
109 S.E.2d 854 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
McRae v. Boykin
179 S.E. 535 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd., of London v. Chattahoochee Lumber Co.
60 S.E. 554 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Anderson v. Wyche
55 S.E. 19 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Braswell v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
35 S.E. 322 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 S.E. 641, 108 Ga. 777, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-c-collier-co-v-murphey-ga-1899.