J. Baranello & Sons v. Great Kills Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

J. Baranello & Sons v. Great Kills Associates

112 A.D.2d 163, 491 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 163 (J. Baranello & Sons v. Great Kills Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Baranello & Sons v. Great Kills Associates, 112 A.D.2d 163, 491 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitrator’s award, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), dated October 6, 1983, which granted the petition to confirm and denied appellant’s cross petition to modify the arbitration award, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated October 25, 1983, entered thereon.

Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248).

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence in the record which brings the matter within the narrowly circumscribed grounds for modifying an arbitration award set forth in CPLR 7511 (c) (see, 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac 7511.22; 5 NY Jur 2d, Arbitration and Award, § 137; Siegel, NY Prac § 604). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitrator’s award, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), dated October 6, 1983, which granted the petition to confirm and denied appellant’s cross petition to modify the arbitration award, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated October 25, 1983, entered thereon.

Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248).

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence in the record which brings the matter within the narrowly circumscribed grounds for modifying an arbitration award set forth in CPLR 7511 (c) (see, 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac 7511.22; 5 NY Jur 2d, Arbitration and Award, § 137; Siegel, NY Prac § 604). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 163, 491 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-baranello-sons-v-great-kills-associates-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack