J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Eaton

133 A. 745, 99 Vt. 262, 1925 Vt. LEXIS 190
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided December 5, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Butler, J.

The action in each ease is tort, founded on G-. L. 6888, in each of which the plaintiffs seek to recover the amount of a postdated check. They are before us on plaintiffs’ exception to the sustaining of defendant’s demurrer to the complaints. The cases were argued and submitted with the case of F. E. Lovell v. Perley R. Eaton, reported in 99 Vt. 255, 133 Atl. 742, where the same questions were raised as here involved. The conclusion there reached is controlling. This requires an affirmance of each of the judgments below.

Judgments affirmed and causes remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Eaton, 133 A. 745, 99 Vt. 262, 1925 Vt. LEXIS 190 (Vt. 1925).

133 A. 745 (J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Town of Cedar Grove
37 S.E.2d 450 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1946)
Woods v. Scott
178 A. 886 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1935)
North Adams Beef & Produce Co. v. Cantor
156 A. 879 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1931)