J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Eaton
This text of 133 A. 745 (J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The action in each ease is tort, founded on G-. L. 6888, in each of which the plaintiffs seek to recover the amount of a postdated check. They are before us on plaintiffs’ exception to the sustaining of defendant’s demurrer to the complaints. The cases were argued and submitted with the case of F. E. Lovell v. Perley R. Eaton, reported in 99 Vt. 255, 133 Atl. 742, where the same questions were raised as here involved. The conclusion there reached is controlling. This requires an affirmance of each of the judgments below.
Judgments affirmed and causes remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A. 745, 99 Vt. 262, 1925 Vt. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-b-lacroix-frere-v-eaton-vt-1925.