J. B. Colt Co. v. Tarkenton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

J. B. Colt Co. v. Tarkenton

136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 832, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 474

DecidedMarch 2, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 926 (J. B. Colt Co. v. Tarkenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. B. Colt Co. v. Tarkenton, 136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 832, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 474 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error.

The exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, including exception to the prayer for special instruction tendered and refused, must all be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial; the ease presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions; the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error.

The exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, including exception to the prayer for special instruction tendered and refused, must all be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial; the ease presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions; the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 832, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-b-colt-co-v-tarkenton-nc-1927.