J. A. Scriven Co. v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.
223 U.S. 708, 32 S. Ct. 518
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; § 6 of act of March 3, 1891, chap. 517, 26 Stat. 828. And see Hutchinson, Pierce & Co. v. Loewy, 217 U. S. 457.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. A. Scriven Co. v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 223 U.S. 708, 32 S. Ct. 518 (1911).
223 U.S. 708 (J. A. Scriven Co. v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith
216 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Hutchinson, Pierce & Co. v. Loewy
217 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1910)