J. A. Scriven Co. v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.
223 U.S. 708, 32 S. Ct. 518
This text of 223 U.S. 708 (J. A. Scriven Co. v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
J. A. Scriven Co. v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 223 U.S. 708, 32 S. Ct. 518 (1911).
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; § 6 of act of March 3, 1891, chap. 517, 26 Stat. 828. And see Hutchinson, Pierce & Co. v. Loewy, 217 U. S. 457.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith
216 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Hutchinson, Pierce & Co. v. Loewy
217 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 U.S. 708, 32 S. Ct. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-a-scriven-co-v-rice-stix-dry-goods-co-scotus-1911.