J. A. Scriven Co. v. Ferguson McKinney Dry Goods Co.

32 App. D.C. 323, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 6102
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 1909
DocketNo. 510
StatusPublished

This text of 32 App. D.C. 323 (J. A. Scriven Co. v. Ferguson McKinney Dry Goods Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. A. Scriven Co. v. Ferguson McKinney Dry Goods Co., 32 App. D.C. 323, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 6102 (D.C. Cir. 1909).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Robb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an opposition by another party [J. A. Scriven Company], to the registration of the mark involved in J. A. Scriven Co. v. W. H. Towles Mfg. Co. No. 509, just decided [ante, 321].

It follows that the decision will be the same as in the ’other case.

The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, and the clerk of the court will certify this opinion and the proceedings in this court to the Commissioner of Patents, as required hy law. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 App. D.C. 323, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 6102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-a-scriven-co-v-ferguson-mckinney-dry-goods-co-cadc-1909.