J. A. Jones Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellants v. Greenbriar Shopping Center, a Joint Venture Composed of W. R. Hawn v. Sam Finley, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Cross-Appellee

461 F.2d 1269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 21, 1972
Docket71-3113
StatusPublished

This text of 461 F.2d 1269 (J. A. Jones Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellants v. Greenbriar Shopping Center, a Joint Venture Composed of W. R. Hawn v. Sam Finley, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. A. Jones Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellants v. Greenbriar Shopping Center, a Joint Venture Composed of W. R. Hawn v. Sam Finley, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Cross-Appellee, 461 F.2d 1269 (3d Cir. 1972).

Opinion

461 F.2d 1269

J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellants,
v.
GREENBRIAR SHOPPING CENTER, a Joint Venture composed of W.
R. Hawn, et al., Defendants-Appellants,
v.
SAM FINLEY, INC., Third Party Defendant-Cross-Appellee.

No. 71-3113.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 12, 1972.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 21, 1972.

Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, William G. Grant, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

Robert B. Ansley, Jr., Smith, Currie & Hancock, Atlanta, J. Carlton Fleming, Fleming, Robinson & Bradshaw, Charlotte, N. C., for Jones.

Dan L. Denison, Cambridge, Mass., Paul Webb, Jr., Webb, Parker, Young & Ferguson, Bertram S. Boley, Atlanta, Ga., for Finley.

Before WISDOM and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We are in agreement with the well considered opinion of the district court, J. A. Jones Const. Co. v. Greenbriar Shopping Center, 332 F.Supp. 1336 (N. D., Ga., 1971), and its judgment is affirmed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 F.2d 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-a-jones-construction-company-plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellants-v-ca3-1972.