Izzo v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Izzo v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

70 A.D.2d 992, 417 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12630

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 992 (Izzo v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Izzo v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, 70 A.D.2d 992, 417 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 6, 1978, which affirmed an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights, dated April 27, 1978, which found no probable cause to believe that the respondent engaged in the discriminatory practice complained of. The petitioner has charged that the respondent union discriminated against him in representing his interests with a former employer because of his age, marital status, disability, and arrest and conviction record. However, the record contains nothing which would suggest any lack of effective representation by the union, much less anything to seriously suggest discrimination against the petitioner. [993]*993Order confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 6, 1978, which affirmed an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights, dated April 27, 1978, which found no probable cause to believe that the respondent engaged in the discriminatory practice complained of. The petitioner has charged that the respondent union discriminated against him in representing his interests with a former employer because of his age, marital status, disability, and arrest and conviction record. However, the record contains nothing which would suggest any lack of effective representation by the union, much less anything to seriously suggest discrimination against the petitioner. [993]*993Order confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 992, 417 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izzo-v-new-york-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1979.