Izzo v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Izzo v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

259 A.D. 720, 18 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6404

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 720 (Izzo v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Izzo v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 259 A.D. 720, 18 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she was struck by defendant’s trolley car while she was crossing a street some distance from a crosswalk, plaintiff recovered a verdict for $1,250. At the close of the case the court reserved decision on defendant’s motion to dismiss, and subsequently set aside the verdict and dismissed the complaint. While the order does not specify the reason for the dismissal, the court indicated that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. Order setting aside the verdict and dismissing the complaint, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —1 Lazansky, P. J.,' Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she was struck by defendant’s trolley car while she was crossing a street some distance from a crosswalk, plaintiff recovered a verdict for $1,250. At the close of the case the court reserved decision on defendant’s motion to dismiss, and subsequently set aside the verdict and dismissed the complaint. While the order does not specify the reason for the dismissal, the court indicated that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. Order setting aside the verdict and dismissing the complaint, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —1 Lazansky, P. J.,' Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 720, 18 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izzo-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1940.