Izzi v. Dolgin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Izzi v. Dolgin

42 A.D.2d 966, 347 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3457

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 966 (Izzi v. Dolgin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Izzi v. Dolgin, 42 A.D.2d 966, 347 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Filomina Izzi, said plaintiff appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated September 27, 1971, which (1) reversed a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered November 27, 1970 in favor of said plaintiff, upon a jury verdict as reduced by the Trial Justice at the Civil Court from $35,000 to $10,000, and (2) ordered a new trial as to damages only. Order of the Appellate Term reversed, on the law, with costs, and judgment of the Civil Court reinstated. In our view it was not improper for the Civil Court, sua sponte, to amend the jury’s verdict to conform with that court’s monetary jurisdictional limit (Abood v. Hospital Ambulance Sen., N. Y. L. J. April 4, 1969, p. 17, col. 3; cf. Abbey Bent A Car v. Moore, 30 A D 2d 952). In so doing, the court was not usurp.ing a jury function (see 8 Carmody-Wait 2d, N. Y. Prac., §§ 58:25, 58:29). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Filomina Izzi, said plaintiff appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated September 27, 1971, which (1) reversed a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered November 27, 1970 in favor of said plaintiff, upon a jury verdict as reduced by the Trial Justice at the Civil Court from $35,000 to $10,000, and (2) ordered a new trial as to damages only. Order of the Appellate Term reversed, on the law, with costs, and judgment of the Civil Court reinstated. In our view it was not improper for the Civil Court, sua sponte, to amend the jury’s verdict to conform with that court’s monetary jurisdictional limit (Abood v. Hospital Ambulance Sen., N. Y. L. J. April 4, 1969, p. 17, col. 3; cf. Abbey Bent A Car v. Moore, 30 A D 2d 952). In so doing, the court was not usurp.ing a jury function (see 8 Carmody-Wait 2d, N. Y. Prac., §§ 58:25, 58:29). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 966, 347 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izzi-v-dolgin-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack