Izhak v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Izhak v. New York City Transit Authority

2 A.D.3d 407, 767 N.Y.S.2d 859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 407 (Izhak v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Izhak v. New York City Transit Authority, 2 A.D.3d 407, 767 N.Y.S.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J), dated July 16, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Smith, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J), dated July 16, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Smith, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 407, 767 N.Y.S.2d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izhak-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2003.