Izgelov v. Shakov

129 A.D.3d 1028, 11 N.Y.S.3d 674
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 2015
Docket2013-05772
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 A.D.3d 1028 (Izgelov v. Shakov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Izgelov v. Shakov, 129 A.D.3d 1028, 11 N.Y.S.3d 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas D. Raffaele, J.), dated March 27, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for an award of child support arrears and directed the plaintiff to pay child support arrears in the sum of $12,500.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In a so-ordered stipulation dated February 10, 2011, the plaintiff agreed to pay the defendant pendente lite child support in the sum of $1,000 per month. There is no evidence in the record to support the plaintiff’s contention that, subsequent to the so-ordered stipulation, the parties agreed that he should *1029 pay less than $1,000 per month in pendente lite child support, or his contention that he made payments to the defendant for child support from May 2011 through June 2012, other than one payment of $500 in November 2011. The plaintiffs contention that a bonus check deposited in the parties’joint bank account several months before he filed for divorce should be credited toward his child support arrears is without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for an award of child support arrears for the period from May 2011 through June 2012, and directed the plaintiff to pay child support arrears in the sum of $12,500.

Skelos, J.P., Chambers, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Indictor v. Indictor
2025 NY Slip Op 01616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D.3d 1028, 11 N.Y.S.3d 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izgelov-v-shakov-nyappdiv-2015.