Iyanobor v. INS
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60227 Summary Calendar __________________
SMART IMHANSIONAN IYANOBOR,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A41-542-100 - - - - - - - - - - April 1, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Smart I. Iyanobor, a Nigerian citizen, asserts that the
Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") erred denying his
application for waiver of inadmissiblity, filed pursuant to 8
U.S.C. § 1182(h). We have reviewed the record and find that the
BIA's affirmance of the Immigration Judge's decision denying the
Iyanobor’s application was supported by substantial evidence and
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-60227 -2-
was neither arbitrary nor capricious. See Opie v. INS, 66 F.3d
737, 739 (5th Cir. 1995).
The petition for review is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Iyanobor v. INS (Iyanobor v. INS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.