Iwuoha v. Ashcroft
This text of Iwuoha v. Ashcroft (Iwuoha v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2536
ISRAEL GHIGBU IWUOHA,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-510-853)
Submitted: September 20, 2004 Decided: September 29, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd F. Ukwu, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Nancy E. Friedman, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Israel Ghigbu Iwuoha, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen deportation
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
Iwuoha’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2)
(2004); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See
In re: Iwuoha, No. A70-510-853 (B.I.A. Dec. 3, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Iwuoha v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iwuoha-v-ashcroft-ca4-2004.